That's just saying the same thing as the article. But instead of reconsidering the premise, this is just doubling down on it. > We should ALWAYS strive to have

That's just saying the same thing as the article. But instead of reconsidering the premise, this is just doubling down on it. > We should ALWAYS strive to have more and better data. If you value data in and of itself, in other words if data is an a priori good, then this is a fetish.