4 ms·
Didn't they start charging because they started getting sued for offering it free of charge? And according to other reports it's apparently illegal in France t
by yanw 15y ago
Didn't they start charging because they started getting sued for offering it free of charge?
And according to other reports it's apparently illegal in France to offer something for free if it costs money to develop. But what about those who enjoyed using the free stuff and even built businesses on top of it?
- lloeki 15y agoThe law says it's forbidden to sell something at a loss. While it's straightforward to evaluate when you resell a physical good as-is, it's quite more shady when you do some transformation (maybe at least the sum of its components?) and outright undefinable for intangible goods, let alone a service. That's the letter of the law, but the spirit of the law is to prevent undercutting your competitors to death. I bet all of this is tied to IGN (France's national mapping agency) offering GéoPortail, a free but absolutely crappy service and a paid yet just as crappy service and dying a horrible, deserved death. They should have kept doing what they do right: providing map data and securing a deal with Google or Nokia for the aerial and street shots, and the maps.
- hessenwolf 15y agoI think this comment should be somewhere at the top. There was a similar law for a long time in Ireland, precisely to prevent companies with a large capital base from pricing their competition out of the market and then raisin their prices afterwards. If this is the reason they were sued, then it's not as big a deal as I thought from the headline.