3 ms·
It depends on the version. In Vista, the one mentioned, they certainly were. It you ran a computer using the minimum specs, it was almost unusable. https://www
by Clubber 4y ago
It depends on the version. In Vista, the one mentioned, they certainly were. It you ran a computer using the minimum specs, it was almost unusable.
https://www.osnews.com/story/16675/vista-minimum-requirements-unrealistic/ https://www.osnews.com/story/16675/vista-minimum-requirement...
- layer8 4y agoYes, but I think Vista was an outlier in that respect.
- Clubber 4y agoIt was certainly the most egregious I recall, but here's an article complaining about Windows 10 minimum specs too. https://winaero.com/the-real-system-requirements-for-windows-10/ https://winaero.com/the-real-system-requirements-for-windows... Here's one for Windows 11 https://www.makeuseof.com/is-4gb-ram-enough-for-windows-11/ https://www.makeuseof.com/is-4gb-ram-enough-for-windows-11/ Seems Windows 8 was ok https://www.networkworld.com/article/2221048/will-windows-8-really-perform-on-well-on-low-end-hardware--here-s-a-test-.html https://www.networkworld.com/article/2221048/will-windows-8-...
- babypuncher 4y agoVista came out over 15 years ago, it hardly seems relevant today.
- goosedragons 4y agoThe same could be said of Mac OS 10.4 at the same time. It was an absolute dog on systems without Quartz Extreme support.