> So "wronger than wrong" is putting a heavy spin on the truth Why do you think you are arguing against the concept? "Wronger than wrong" argues against believ

> So "wronger than wrong" is putting a heavy spin on the truth Why do you think you are arguing against the concept? "Wronger than wrong" argues against believing everything is "equally wrong", which is precisely what your comment is also arguing against. In other words, you agree with Asimov that equating all thing as equally wrong is "wronger than wrong", since there will always (or often) be an ordering of "less wrong".