> That's the spirit here and trying to argue around that with technicalities is disingenuous. First, I am not a lawyer, but don't licenses exist precisely for

> That's the spirit here and trying to argue around that with technicalities is disingenuous. First, I am not a lawyer, but don't licenses exist precisely for their technicalities? This is not like a law on the books in which case we can consider the "Letter and Spirit of the law" because we know in what context in which it was written in/for. With a written license however, someone chooses to adopt a license and accepts those terms from an authorship point-of-view.