3 ms·
That's what Adobe Firefly is already doing, it's trained on Adobe Stock photos along with copyright-free content https://www.adobe.com/sensei/generative-ai/fir
by sebstefan 4y ago
That's what Adobe Firefly is already doing, it's trained on Adobe Stock photos along with copyright-free content
https://www.adobe.com/sensei/generative-ai/firefly.html https://www.adobe.com/sensei/generative-ai/firefly.html
- Bedon292 4y agoThe tricky bit is that those stock photos include generative images too. Many of which aren't labeled as generative. So I wonder if theirs is already including potentially problematic content.
- yencabulator 4y agoI would be surprised if they hadn't externalized that risk when they started their stock photo library. Generally, whenever a company buys a photo, there's a release form where the claimed-author of the photo has to state that they own the rights to the photo. So, the infringement is on the part of the seller, and you have a high barrier to sue Adobe for that.
- dragonwriter 4y ago> So, the infringement is on the part of the seller, and you have a high barrier to sue Adobe for that. No, you don’t, Adobe just has a low barrier to suck the source of the image into the case as an additio al defendano and a potential additional de¹1¹fense against any claim of willful infringement. OTOH, Adobe would like potential plaintiffs to think that it works the way you describe.