3 ms·
> This makes zero sense. Please elaborate. I did in another comment under this one. Would you elaborate on why the opposite would be true?
by pastacacioepepe 4y ago
> This makes zero sense. Please elaborate.
I did in another comment under this one. Would you elaborate on why the opposite would be true?
- bilekas 4y agoLets keep thing simple : NATO ensures support from other members if your sovereignty is attacked. Meaning you don't need to only depend on your own Military capabilities in order to protect your borders. Finland joining makes Finland's borders a FAR more expensive attack than was previously. > joining NATO only makes NATO less secure as a whole NATO is not an offensive/invading force. It's a defensive force. If NATO had what you're referring to as a level of security, it has only increased due to more forces available to respond. It's that simple.