4 ms·
That's not the case, there's a probability it may "spit back" the protected expression. There's also a probability I, as a human "spit back" the protected expre
by theonlybutlet 4y ago
That's not the case, there's a probability it may "spit back" the protected expression.
There's also a probability I, as a human "spit back" the protected expressions. This could either be by pure chance or from past learnings, reading the protected code and internalizing it as a solution, my subconscious forgetting I actually saw it elsewhere.
In Uni, students run their theses through plagiarism checkers, even if it's novel research as it naturally occurs.
As the thought experiment goes, given infinity, a monkey with a typewriter will inevitably write Shakespeares works.
- EarlKing 4y ago...except you don't need an infinite number of monkeys. It has been trained to produce protected expressions by virtue of being trained on protected expressions. The probability of it producing a protected expression at some point is 1.
- theonlybutlet 4y agoThe same truth holds for you or me writing up that code.
- EarlKing 4y agoNo it doesn't. My mind contains information derived from expressions I've read which I can rearrange into novel expressions. I don't regurgitate protected expressions verbatim. Co-Pilot does.
- theonlybutlet 4y agoThat's exactly what co-pilot does, ask it to rearrange it if what it comes up with is the same. That's what code plagiarism checkers are for.