4 ms·
I’m not sure if the example fits to the concept. Your example describe a poor trade-off discussion. The wiki article describes a “spectrum of wrongness”, on w
by baxtr 4y ago
I’m not sure if the example fits to the concept.
Your example describe a poor trade-off discussion.
The wiki article describes a “spectrum of wrongness”, on which you can sort wrong things.
My 5c at least. But maybe I’m wronger!
- glenstein 4y agoYou are right. With the sitting example, the ideal case is perfect health. The trade-offs have different distances from the ideal case. You are correct that those distances are not strictly distances of wrongness, but they are nevertheless something you can be "Wronger Than Wrong" about if you treat them the same.