4 ms·

To put it succintly, he's the Joe Rogan of IQ 100-115 people.

by meindnoch 4y ago

theropost 4y ago
Any one you can suggest for the 116-130 people?
- deleted 4y ago
  [deleted]
- keiferski 4y ago
  It's not a tech podcast, but I enjoy Hermitix. They are mostly interviews with authors of philosophy/literary studies books. Probably the only "podcaster" that I will listen to on a regular basis. https://www.youtube.com/@hermitixpodcast https://www.youtube.com/@hermitixpodcast
  - malborodog 4y ago
    +1 for hermitix -- funny to see it come up on HN!
- sambapa 4y ago
  Joe Rogan
- ZeroGravitas 4y ago
  The extensive archive of BBC's "In Our Tine" covers a lot of interesting ground. Not sure exactly how that maps to IQ ranges, but worth checking out anyway. https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/articles/2Dw1c7rxs6DmyK0pMRwpMq1/archive https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/articles/2Dw1c7rxs6DmyK0pMR...
username_my1 4y ago
not really, Joe Rogan pre pandamic was still the best interviewer in my openion of smart people. the problem with smart people is that they know that they're smart and so they won't stop talking or driving the conversation. Joe Rogan, pre pandamic / spotify deal was humble enough and would just invite people and let them talk, it was way more informative and less echo champery style of conversation ... I can't stand listening to this guy.
tipsytoad 4y ago
Ignoring the arrogance that, the network effects of his podcast is incredible. I don't know of another podcast that gets the kind of guest list lex does. But you're right, his questions are often quite (pseudo-intellectual?) he's got a thing for "are we living in a simulation"
- Eisenstein 4y ago
  > he's got a thing for "are we living in a simulation" The 'simulation' argument is actually very persuasive if you look into it. Quoted below from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simulation_hypothesis https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simulation_hypothesis: [Begin quote.] Bostrom's trilemma argues that one of three unlikely-seeming propositions is almost certainly true: 1. "The fraction of human-level civilizations that reach a posthuman stage (that is, one capable of running high-fidelity ancestor simulations) is very close to zero", or 2. "The fraction of posthuman civilizations that are interested in running simulations of their evolutionary history, or variations thereof, is very close to zero", or 3. "The fraction of all people with our kind of experiences that are living in a simulation is very close to one." The trilemma points out that a technologically mature "posthuman" civilization would have enormous computing power; if even a tiny percentage of them were to run "ancestor simulations" (that is, "high-fidelity" simulations of ancestral life that would be indistinguishable from reality to the simulated ancestor), the total number of simulated ancestors, or "Sims", in the universe (or multiverse, if it exists) would greatly exceed the total number of actual ancestors. Bostrom goes on to use a type of anthropic reasoning to claim that, if the third proposition is the one of those three that is true, and almost all people live in simulations, then humans are almost certainly living in a simulation. [End quote.] * Note I don't care at all about Friedman and have listened to exactly one of his podcasts (Carmack).
  - tipsytoad 4y ago
    I think I misrepresented the point there a little. It's not the fundamental question per se but something he asks every one of his guests, and comes off alil 3am teenage philosopher. I don't mean to bash him too much though, I think it's hard interviewing experts in areas they have spent their whole lives in and not to feel less informed in comparison.

To put it succintly, he's the Joe Rogan of IQ 100-115 people.

theropost 4y ago

Any one you can suggest for the 116-130 people?

deleted 4y ago
[deleted]
keiferski 4y ago
It's not a tech podcast, but I enjoy Hermitix. They are mostly interviews with authors of philosophy/literary studies books. Probably the only "podcaster" that I will listen to on a regular basis. https://www.youtube.com/@hermitixpodcast https://www.youtube.com/@hermitixpodcast
- malborodog 4y ago
  +1 for hermitix -- funny to see it come up on HN!
sambapa 4y ago
Joe Rogan
ZeroGravitas 4y ago
The extensive archive of BBC's "In Our Tine" covers a lot of interesting ground. Not sure exactly how that maps to IQ ranges, but worth checking out anyway. https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/articles/2Dw1c7rxs6DmyK0pMRwpMq1/archive https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/articles/2Dw1c7rxs6DmyK0pMR...

username_my1 4y ago

not really, Joe Rogan pre pandamic was still the best interviewer in my openion of smart people. the problem with smart people is that they know that they're smart and so they won't stop talking or driving the conversation. Joe Rogan, pre pandamic / spotify deal was humble enough and would just invite people and let them talk, it was way more informative and less echo champery style of conversation ... I can't stand listening to this guy.

tipsytoad 4y ago

Ignoring the arrogance that, the network effects of his podcast is incredible. I don't know of another podcast that gets the kind of guest list lex does. But you're right, his questions are often quite (pseudo-intellectual?) he's got a thing for "are we living in a simulation"

Eisenstein 4y ago
> he's got a thing for "are we living in a simulation" The 'simulation' argument is actually very persuasive if you look into it. Quoted below from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simulation_hypothesis https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simulation_hypothesis: [Begin quote.] Bostrom's trilemma argues that one of three unlikely-seeming propositions is almost certainly true: 1. "The fraction of human-level civilizations that reach a posthuman stage (that is, one capable of running high-fidelity ancestor simulations) is very close to zero", or 2. "The fraction of posthuman civilizations that are interested in running simulations of their evolutionary history, or variations thereof, is very close to zero", or 3. "The fraction of all people with our kind of experiences that are living in a simulation is very close to one." The trilemma points out that a technologically mature "posthuman" civilization would have enormous computing power; if even a tiny percentage of them were to run "ancestor simulations" (that is, "high-fidelity" simulations of ancestral life that would be indistinguishable from reality to the simulated ancestor), the total number of simulated ancestors, or "Sims", in the universe (or multiverse, if it exists) would greatly exceed the total number of actual ancestors. Bostrom goes on to use a type of anthropic reasoning to claim that, if the third proposition is the one of those three that is true, and almost all people live in simulations, then humans are almost certainly living in a simulation. [End quote.] * Note I don't care at all about Friedman and have listened to exactly one of his podcasts (Carmack).
- tipsytoad 4y ago
  I think I misrepresented the point there a little. It's not the fundamental question per se but something he asks every one of his guests, and comes off alil 3am teenage philosopher. I don't mean to bash him too much though, I think it's hard interviewing experts in areas they have spent their whole lives in and not to feel less informed in comparison.