3 ms·
As a consumer, within some definition of reason, I would be ok with taking "good enough" for $200 and then just doing another $200 for more work to improve on t
by Brian_K_White 4y ago
As a consumer, within some definition of reason, I would be ok with taking "good enough" for $200 and then just doing another $200 for more work to improve on that, as it's own new distinct job.
At these levels it's not such a concern about getting stuck with a bad job. You just don't use that developer again and the $200 didn't wipe out your company.
I've commissioned jobs like that on freelancer sites for a lot more and pretty much did the same thing. Paid someone else to rework it or reworked it myself. I wouldn't use them again, but I did still get enough of what I needed and the job got done.
I guess it goes the other way too. Let's say I'm uncommonly generous and most other consumers will be much more demanding and try to get away with whatever they can. So the same thing as a provider. You get burned by one buyer for $200, you just don't service them any more but otherwise don't worry about the chance too much.
- pl90087 4y agoI see. How do you prevent them from submitting another bounty though? Should you warn them that next time you will not accept a PR? I mean, the wheel otherwise just turns one more time and you are back in the same seat.
- Brian_K_White 4y agoI'm assuming you can see who is offering to do the job and select someone else. If that's not the case then you're right.