3 ms·
"Semi-rural" Proportion of urban population 92.57% https://www.statista.com/statistics/276724/urbanization-in-the-netherlands/ https://www.statista.com/statis
by l3x4ur1n 4y ago
"Semi-rural"
Proportion of urban population 92.57%
https://www.statista.com/statistics/276724/urbanization-in-the-netherlands/ https://www.statista.com/statistics/276724/urbanization-in-t...
- sourcecodeplz 4y agoNot to mention NL is like a blip on the world map as compared to AU on size..:)
- happytiger 4y agoAu is only slightly smaller than the USA with 25.7 million people vs just California’s 39.24 and the Netherlands have 17.53 million — but bear in mind Australia is 186 times the size of the NDs. So it’s not surprising service is so good — the density of population makes broadband extremely profitable. People forget. The numbers tell a really great story.
- 411111111111111 4y agoThe population density is a correlated number, but it's not necessarily an issue, which makes this into one of my pet peeves. You could have a gigantic nation which is completely centralized into one city, giving you a super low population density on paper. It's not the case in any of your example, so not really an issue here. Nonetheless...
- ghaff 4y agoFor that matter, Australia as a whole--like some other low density areas like Alaska--actually has fairly concentrated population centers.
- happytiger 4y agoYes, absolutely true. I think there’s something like 8M people just in NSW and the majority are Sydney. Only trying to provide context for the economics of density in places like Singapore and the a Netherlands, not necessarily prove the opposite use case. I just wanted to highlight a contrasting factor that is very important for fiber and other high speed service viability. There are many others! These criticisms are totally valid.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]