3 ms·
I won't be surprised if some of their folks go to jail. I work in the industry, have designed and tested many similar devices, and the credible accounts I've r
by iancmceachern 4y ago
I won't be surprised if some of their folks go to jail.
I work in the industry, have designed and tested many similar devices, and the credible accounts I've read of the things they did are criminal.
- pyinstallwoes 4y agoLike what?
- iancmceachern 4y agohttps://www.pcrm.org/news/news-releases/ahead-elon-musks-show-and-tell-doctors-group-reveals-disturbing-truth-behind https://www.pcrm.org/news/news-releases/ahead-elon-musks-sho... This has some more details from the public info: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.vox.com/platform/amp/future-perfect/2022/12/11/23500157/neuralink-animal-testing-elon-musk-usda-probe https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.vox.com/platform/amp/future...
- zaroth 4y agoThese are more like hit pieces by advocacy groups that are against all forms of animal testing. The Vox article for example was written by the partner of someone who worked at PCRM - the advocacy group that filed the complaint. The article is also packed with pictures of animal abuse that has absolutely nothing to do with Neuralink - which they do mentioned in the fine print. These images of course are entirely misleading and have no place in the article other than trying to draw a false equivalence.
- iancmceachern 4y agoAnd those points make what happoned less true or less bad?
- zaroth 4y agoI can’t speak to “truth”, only trust. If the reporting is ideological, the likelihood that the narrative is slanted is high. Is Neuralink doing something wrong, or are they being targeting by ideologues? We don’t know. I don’t think animal testing is bad per se, and I’m very distrustful of news releases from organizations that are against all animal testing where their reporting is peppered with totally unrelated images of animal abuse, just to be inflammatory.
- echelon 4y agoAnimals die for humans to live better lives all the time. There are protocols to minimize, but not eliminate, suffering. Animal testing is a greater good that helps us understand the diseases that plague us and look for cures. The goals of Neuralink are some of the most important being undertaken. It might seem abstract or wishful to some, but should they succeed we will have a plausible way to escape our mortality. It's a long shot, but we should absolutely take it.
- klodolph 4y agoNeuralink’s goals aren’t sufficient justification here, the question is about whether the actual research done by Neuralink can plausibly produce outcomes that benefit us, and whether the subjects are suffering needlessly. If you try to rush research, you don’t necessarily get the same research but faster, you might just get bad research instead.
- throwaway60701 4y agoWhy is eating steak a sufficient reason but developing such life-changing technology is not? We already know that BCIs work and bring enormous benefits to people with epilepsy, ADHD, etc. There's no question about that. The only problem is, and that's what Neuralink aims to solve, that it's a very invasive procedure, so it's not being done often. But we know it works.
- klodolph 4y ago
- chillfox 4y agoThey won't unless someone who know specifics actually reports it.
- iancmceachern 4y agoThey have been... https://www.pcrm.org/news/news-releases/ahead-elon-musks-show-and-tell-doctors-group-reveals-disturbing-truth-behind https://www.pcrm.org/news/news-releases/ahead-elon-musks-sho...