3 ms·
Even though there's definitely a strong state by state correlation, I thought it was interesting that a number of states (like South Dakota and Wyoming) had suc
by Rebelgecko 4y ago
Even though there's definitely a strong state by state correlation, I thought it was interesting that a number of states (like South Dakota and Wyoming) had such a wide range of outcomes. Not sure of that's just randomness due to smaller population sizes or what
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- zoklet-enjoyer 4y agoThose are reservations. MT, ND, MN, WI too https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_reservation https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_reservation
- Rebelgecko 4y agoWell, that's a very depressing answer to the mystery. Thanks though!
- red-iron-pine 4y agoSmaller populations, more rural populations -- see also: rural vs urban divide -- and, as another poster mentioned, Native American reservations, which are often some of the poorest areas in the US.