3 ms·
I mean...yes and no. Starlink is valuable provided it's cheap: above a certain price point, the number of applications drops off and there's no guarantee the re
by XorNot 4y ago
I mean...yes and no. Starlink is valuable provided it's cheap: above a certain price point, the number of applications drops off and there's no guarantee the remainder will represent enough to actually fund it.
- lazide 4y agoCompared to competitors, starlink is dirt cheap. Hughes has roughly 500ms ping times, and severe data caps, and was roughly that price.
- ghaff 4y agoStarlink actually seems underpriced to me. If the choice is Starlink, Hughes, maybe an equally barely-viable cellular hotspot, not everyone could afford $200-$300/month but a lot would.