> I think he was trying to explain the implications of this fact, but doing so in an incredibly garbled manner, and getting his conclusions wrong. Yeah. I like

> I think he was trying to explain the implications of this fact, but doing so in an incredibly garbled manner, and getting his conclusions wrong. Yeah. I like using the expression "knows just enough to be dangerous" (usually applied in humility to myself), and this situation is such a perfect example. Someone who seems to know just enough about the advanced workings under mmap() to completely misunderstand the implications.