4 ms·
I've heard all this. What I've not heard is a plausible, concrete mechanism for it to happen. Only wild speculation. Questions: define "better then human level
by andrewflnr 4y ago
I've heard all this. What I've not heard is a plausible, concrete mechanism for it to happen. Only wild speculation.
Questions: define "better then human levels"? Better in what respects? What is the mechanism by which it improves itself, especially one that isn't wholly reliant on human cooperation? What is the actual motive for "turning on humans"? Current AIs don't seem to have motives at all; it's kind of a bio-evolved thing. How will a suitably motivated AI get access to enough physical power to "wipe us out", bearing in mind that would be a tall order even for a major nuclear power going rogue, to say nothing if having to work through manipulated servants (and don't forget that "human level intelligences", or greater if you don't collaborations, armed with dedicated neural circuitry for empathy, have been working on how to manipulate people for literal millennia with spotty results.
All of these things have to go exactly wrong for AGI to be what kills us. Something else will almost certainly get us first.