3 ms·
This doesn't really seem like a real issue. By eschewing domain names, you've already killed any chance of a mainstream audience for the site. That's fine, but
by stu2b50 4y ago
This doesn't really seem like a real issue. By eschewing domain names, you've already killed any chance of a mainstream audience for the site. That's fine, but it's also not particularly complicated for the users to support an alternative protocol where you don't need TLS if it's already so niche.
- jjav 4y ago> By eschewing domain names, you've already killed any chance of a mainstream audience for the site. That's fine, but it's also not particularly complicated for the users to support an alternative protocol where you don't need TLS if it's already so niche. These are very different. If need to convince your audience to get and install some alternate client with an alternate protocol, now you audience it at best only a few techies who can do that for themselves. Whereas sending anyone an URL they can click on with any client, even if it identified by an IP address instead of a hostname, is as easy at it gets.