3 ms·
I look forward to being blocked by you, lol. My network devices have a convenient option already to block all QUIC traffic, and it is one of the settings I imme
by ocdtrekkie 4y ago
I look forward to being blocked by you, lol. My network devices have a convenient option already to block all QUIC traffic, and it is one of the settings I immediately sought out. (We also block VPNs where I work, generally.)
Network management is there for a purpose, and the people focusing on bypassing it are generally bad actors. The authors of HTTP/2 and HTTP/3 are more focused on guaranteeing delivery of ads than being able to block malicious activity.
- amaccuish 4y ago> Network management is there for a purpose, and the people focusing on bypassing it are generally bad actors I don't follow your reasoning. So you have the ability to block QUIC, but declare QUIC to be a "bad actor" trying to bypass your network management? They switched from TCP to QUIC base, what can be done over HTTP3 can also be done over HTTP2.
- afiori 4y agoQUIC is completely opaque to the network, TCP exposes a lot of information about the connection(s). From the POV of the network it is much more similar to a UDP VPN than to HTTPS over TCP
- jeroenhd 4y agoRest easy, HTTP/3 and below have fallback mechanisms all the way back to HTTP 1.0, as long as you still keep TLS enabled. I'm not planning on blocking anything older than TLS 1.2 in my standard config. I fully support user choice to disable whatever protocol they want. I also think modern browsers lack options in this department. If you dislike QUIC, which I can completely understand, you should disable it. On the server side, though, you can use modern servers and tell all your clients to stick with HTTP 1.1. Let the people who do like QUIC (or don't care) get the benefit of faster page loads and lower latency. HTTP/2 and HTTP/3 solve some real performance issues, particularly for users with unstable or slow internet connections. I don't see why would would deprive them of that simply because you prefer to have the protocol disabled.
- ocdtrekkie 4y agoThat's a reasonable position. And don't get me wrong, I understand there are situations and reasons as a client to want these tools available. But networks often block them for security reasons, and it's their network and prerogative to do it as a condition to use the network.