5 ms·
Whilst I don’t think that GPT-5 will be AGI this is a very poor reasoning. “knowing what it means” isn’t measurable and if anything lately it seems like it’s m
by dogma1138 4y ago
Whilst I don’t think that GPT-5 will be AGI this is a very poor reasoning.
“knowing what it means” isn’t measurable and if anything lately it seems like it’s more and more a coping mechanism so we can still remain special.
There is absolutely nothing currently that can prove that human intelligence isn’t just a very large LLM or that an LLM can’t model it sufficiently.
Hallucinations might actually be the missing piece we humans are full of shit and come up with crazy explanations for things all the time.
However we do have various methods of testing these explanations which we often call theories and hypotheses both through running dedicated experiment as well as just participating in the grander social experiment which is civilization.
- beanbean01 4y agoThank you for this. This is one of the things that bugs me about the AGI debate when people argue over when/if computers will match human intelligence. Just one small problem: we don't have a working definition of human level intelligence!