3 ms·
The stuff that isn't the consequence of machine learning but their company policy determined content limitations (no bad words, appear like Ghandi etc.). Its th
by nathias 4y ago
The stuff that isn't the consequence of machine learning but their company policy determined content limitations (no bad words, appear like Ghandi etc.). Its the same as platforms, either be content neutral or take responsibility.
- nomel 4y agoThis model has far fewer, what you would call "explicitly set", limitations in place. That's why it's able to go into dark/explicit corners of conversation. That's literally its selling point. Your recommendation seems, logically, backwards, if you want "consequences" for things "explicitly set", since a completely unlimited AI would mean no consequences.
- nathias 4y agoI don't see the logic, I just want the consequences to be proportional to control/censure of the platform, so we aren't in the same situation as with platforms where they are immune to legislation as if content neutral but also able to determine content.
- nomel 4y ago> I just want the consequences to be proportional to control/censure of the platform Correct me If I'm misinterpreting what you're saying. It seems like you're saying that if some company released an AI trained with public data, but had no "controls" in place, they would be relatively free of consequences? These "uncontrolled" models will trivially generate text that is racist, give you directions to build a bomb, and give you a never conversation of ways to off yourself, and why you should.
- nathias 4y agocorrect,I don't think information can harm anyone