3 ms·

This is a negotiating position (!) by the EU Parliament, not a finished regulation or decree. Regarding the actual content: If adopted as proposed (which is un

by tfourb 4y ago

This is a negotiating position (!) by the EU Parliament, not a finished regulation or decree. Regarding the actual content: If adopted as proposed (which is unlikely), it would force owners of the 30% of least energy efficient houses (compared to the national, not EU-wide, housing stock) to upgrade their houses to come in line with the next higher energy efficiency class – by 2033, so ten years from now. I own several buildings, both quite old (1960s), as well as brand new (net-positive energy). Improving an existing building in the worst energy efficiency class to come in line with the proposed standards is in most cases an expense in the low five figures, which (at least in Germany) will be subsidized with up to 50% of the costs. Lower energy consumption will in most cases pay for the renovation within a few years. Many of the measures (i.e. new heating source and radiators, new windows) would have to be done on those houses anyway, because the old systems reach their end of life. So what are people complaining about, exactly?

sfvisser 4y ago
> I own several buildings > expense in the low five figures > So what are people complaining about, exactly? This is an incredible take. Many people don’t have the luxury to just spend five figures on a mandatory house renovation.
- bojan 4y ago
  It will be heavily subsidized. Nobody will get into trouble for not being able to afford insulation. That's not how the law in European countries works.
  - tfourb 4y ago
    Just to underline how property law works in many EU countries: I have a tenant who is actively destroying the apartment he lives in. It is still practically impossible to dissolve my rent agreement with him, because the courts see it as likely that he would end up homeless. There is simply no conceivable reality in which our current system of laws would force a cash-strapped, 80 year old house owner out of his property simply because they can't follow up on EU energy regulations. We have plenty of legal safeguards to weigh social outcomes against the impact of laws and regulations.
- tfourb 4y ago
  Let me get this straight: - You own an asset worth 200,000-300,000 Euros - The required investment, which can be spread over up to ten years, is 20,000-30,000 Euros - You would have to make parts of this investment anyway, because your windows are leaky and your radiators are breaking - You will recoup the costs over 5-10 years because you use less energy - 25-50% of this investment will be covered by subsidies, the government will also provide low-interest loans for much of the rest How is this an absurd demand to make of people who own a house?
  - atq2119 4y ago
    Not to mention that 200k-300k is the absolute low end for a house. Around here you're lucky to get something for 5 times that.
    - the_third_wave 4y ago
      There is more than just whatever urbanised area you happen to live which gave you this rather myopic view. Even in the Netherlands - where housing is expensive - €300K will give you plenty of choice [1]. In the south of Sweden it will buy you a largish villa while in the north it buys you a large farm. [1] https://localfocus2.appspot.com/593e6715568f0 https://localfocus2.appspot.com/593e6715568f0 (click on municipality for an overview of prices)
  - waihtis 4y ago
    For us in FIN, the bulk majority that will get hit worst are low-income rural households that aren't nearly worth 200,000k. In fact it will probably result in a lot of abandoned homes as it isn't worth investing 20k euros to renovate a 60-80k house, not that anyone is lending that money to these homes anyway. You have perfectly demonstrated how idiotic these blanket EU-level policies are as they take no consideration of local situations.
    - tfourb 4y ago
      As I wrote above, the proposed (!) regulation would be based on the national housing stock. So if you are in Finnland, the energy efficiency of your house would be compared to other finish houses, not a house in Germany. Which is the definition of "considering local situations". Also, a quick check reveals that only about 14% of the Finish population lives in rural areas [1]. Even if every single one of those persons is a house owner and poor (unlikely, as those categories are to a certain extend mutually exclusive), it would be quite feasible for the Finish government to heavily subsidize the renovation of the entirety of the rural housing stock. Nothing in the proposed regulation would keep national governments from using policy making to implement the required goals in a socially acceptable way. Also, what do you propose would be the alternative? Improving the energy efficiency of the housing stock is in most countries among the most efficient ways to conserve energy. Other approaches to conserve energy or produce the required energy in a sustainable way cost considerably more per kw/h than bringing a 50 year old house to a modern energy standard. And of course given the prevalence of oil and natural gas based heating systems in old houses, you actually have to invest in a new heating source to switch away from CO2-emitting energy sources, anyway. EDIT: quick back of the envelope math suggests that it would cost the finish government 5% of the current annual budget for each of the coming ten years to invest 20.000 Euros into each of the approximately 250.000 rural houses (assuming an average occupancy of 3 people per house). Not a bad investment considering that it would be made up in a few years through energy savings. [1] https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.RUR.TOTL.ZS?locations=FI https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.RUR.TOTL.ZS?location...

by tfourb 4y ago

sfvisser 4y ago

> I own several buildings > expense in the low five figures > So what are people complaining about, exactly? This is an incredible take. Many people don’t have the luxury to just spend five figures on a mandatory house renovation.

bojan 4y ago
It will be heavily subsidized. Nobody will get into trouble for not being able to afford insulation. That's not how the law in European countries works.
- tfourb 4y ago
  Just to underline how property law works in many EU countries: I have a tenant who is actively destroying the apartment he lives in. It is still practically impossible to dissolve my rent agreement with him, because the courts see it as likely that he would end up homeless. There is simply no conceivable reality in which our current system of laws would force a cash-strapped, 80 year old house owner out of his property simply because they can't follow up on EU energy regulations. We have plenty of legal safeguards to weigh social outcomes against the impact of laws and regulations.
tfourb 4y ago
Let me get this straight: - You own an asset worth 200,000-300,000 Euros - The required investment, which can be spread over up to ten years, is 20,000-30,000 Euros - You would have to make parts of this investment anyway, because your windows are leaky and your radiators are breaking - You will recoup the costs over 5-10 years because you use less energy - 25-50% of this investment will be covered by subsidies, the government will also provide low-interest loans for much of the rest How is this an absurd demand to make of people who own a house?
- atq2119 4y ago
  Not to mention that 200k-300k is the absolute low end for a house. Around here you're lucky to get something for 5 times that.
  - the_third_wave 4y ago
    There is more than just whatever urbanised area you happen to live which gave you this rather myopic view. Even in the Netherlands - where housing is expensive - €300K will give you plenty of choice [1]. In the south of Sweden it will buy you a largish villa while in the north it buys you a large farm. [1] https://localfocus2.appspot.com/593e6715568f0 https://localfocus2.appspot.com/593e6715568f0 (click on municipality for an overview of prices)
- waihtis 4y ago
  For us in FIN, the bulk majority that will get hit worst are low-income rural households that aren't nearly worth 200,000k. In fact it will probably result in a lot of abandoned homes as it isn't worth investing 20k euros to renovate a 60-80k house, not that anyone is lending that money to these homes anyway. You have perfectly demonstrated how idiotic these blanket EU-level policies are as they take no consideration of local situations.
  - tfourb 4y ago
    As I wrote above, the proposed (!) regulation would be based on the national housing stock. So if you are in Finnland, the energy efficiency of your house would be compared to other finish houses, not a house in Germany. Which is the definition of "considering local situations". Also, a quick check reveals that only about 14% of the Finish population lives in rural areas [1]. Even if every single one of those persons is a house owner and poor (unlikely, as those categories are to a certain extend mutually exclusive), it would be quite feasible for the Finish government to heavily subsidize the renovation of the entirety of the rural housing stock. Nothing in the proposed regulation would keep national governments from using policy making to implement the required goals in a socially acceptable way. Also, what do you propose would be the alternative? Improving the energy efficiency of the housing stock is in most countries among the most efficient ways to conserve energy. Other approaches to conserve energy or produce the required energy in a sustainable way cost considerably more per kw/h than bringing a 50 year old house to a modern energy standard. And of course given the prevalence of oil and natural gas based heating systems in old houses, you actually have to invest in a new heating source to switch away from CO2-emitting energy sources, anyway. EDIT: quick back of the envelope math suggests that it would cost the finish government 5% of the current annual budget for each of the coming ten years to invest 20.000 Euros into each of the approximately 250.000 rural houses (assuming an average occupancy of 3 people per house). Not a bad investment considering that it would be made up in a few years through energy savings. [1] https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.RUR.TOTL.ZS?locations=FI https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.RUR.TOTL.ZS?location...