5 ms·
This is completely at odds with the French GR (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GR_footpath https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GR_footpath) trail. There are legal manda
by julienb_sea 4y ago
This is completely at odds with the French GR (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GR_footpath https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GR_footpath) trail. There are legal mandates to require public access to all coastline country wide and they are aggressively enforced. Nothing comparable exists in the US or most countries.
- swalling 4y agoThere are more miles of coastline with legally mandated public access in the US than in France. It’s simply handled at the state level not the federal. https://beachapedia.org/Beach_Access https://beachapedia.org/Beach_Access
- WastingMyTime89 4y ago> There are more miles of coastline with legally mandated public access in the US than in France. This sentence is silly. France is smaller than Texas.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- dragonwriter 4y ago> There are more miles of coastline with legally mandated public access in the US than in France. France has 2,000 miles of total coastline (before considering access); Alaska alone has over 6,600. A more sane comparison would be share of coastline with public access, or maybe for some purposes per-capita public access coastline. But absolute miles of public access coastline is silly.
- swalling 4y agoIf you include Alaska, ~75% of the US coastline has meaningful public access protections. If you don't include Alaska, because people don't sunbathe topless there or whatever, it's like ~20% based on my napkin math? The original comment was "Nothing comparable exists in the US". Given that the entire West Coast and other key beach recreation states like North Carolina and Hawaii have stellar laws on public access, the root comment was simply not true.
- seszett 4y agoWell, 20% is really not comparable with France's 100%, is it? Or it is comparable, but quite unfavourably.
- dminor 4y agoOregon has similar laws - all beaches are public.