3 ms·
When I was a young person, I used to deride writings like 1984 on the grounds that the scenarios and stories presented to carry the message were too far-fetched
by pen2l 4y ago
When I was a young person, I used to deride writings like 1984 on the grounds that the scenarios and stories presented to carry the message were too far-fetched.
Reading your comment has set off an epiphany, I think I get it now, there probably exists some higher-up person who is thinking along these lines: we must always be in a state of war, for if we are, the populace will want to be ready and willing to fund the instruments of war. And we always want to be ready for war, because if ever we are not, we lose our capability to win a potential future war. For our very survival we must contribute our efforts to build these instruments of war. War is constant. War is peace.
- HyperSane 4y agoThe more powerful your military is the less likely you will need to use it to defend yourself.
- MichaelZuo 4y agoFrom near-peer opponents, yes. But it increases the temptation to use it against weaker opponents.
- HyperSane 4y agoOffensive use of a military is a very different thing.
- MichaelZuo 4y agoIn the real world there are no clear cut boundaries like that so it’s military action either way.