4 ms·
I've noticed this to some extent with their CPUs as well. From what I can tell this is, in part, because AMD run their chips much closer to their physical limi
by tigeroil 4y ago
I've noticed this to some extent with their CPUs as well.
From what I can tell this is, in part, because AMD run their chips much closer to their physical limits than say, Intel or Nvidia do. They're all redlining so to speak.
As such this means that any differences in the silicon are much more likely to have an impact on performance.
- _a_a_a_ 4y agoI can't make sense of this. CPUs microarchitecture is run at their clock speed. If they're running close to their physical limits, either they don't fail in which case all's well, or they fail in which case it's a wipeout such as a blue screen, reboot, freezes, corruption or whatever. AFAICS they can't run correctly but somehow slower. Be good if you could explain where I'm getting it wrong.
- doubled112 4y ago> run at their clock speed The clock speed for a CPU is dynamic. Both Intel and AMD CPUs will boost their clocks to as high as possible given the current conditions. Some will boost higher than others, even in the same batch. They are even labelled "up to" like a cable internet connection.
- _a_a_a_ 4y agoYou're right, thanks.