So nobody else wastes time excitedly reading the paper like I did: >In conclusion, while GPTrillion is a fictional model, this paper can still serve as a humor

So nobody else wastes time excitedly reading the paper like I did: >In conclusion, while GPTrillion is a fictional model, this paper can still serve as a humorous commentary on the state of language modeling and the challenges that come with training and developing large models. However, it is essential to maintain scientific integrity and ensure that claims made in research papers are based on real experiments and data. Not sure I get the joke, but it did manage to fool me into getting my hopes up briefly.