Ofcourse the AI "came to that conclussion" (better said as parroted because there is no thought process behind it) because that is the general atmosphere of th

Ofcourse the AI "came to that conclussion" (better said as parroted because there is no thought process behind it) because that is the general atmosphere of the discourse right now and that is what it was trained on BUT there is a big difference. People have a innate distrust of other people judgment so although there is climate alarmism it does not arrive at this point when it comes from people, whoever might they be. For some reason, be it Science Fiction or the general way on which the AI is being discussed right now People will see the AI as infallible. This view has played the main role in this case. It was not Climate Alarmism per se, but the fact that even the "almighty" AI could not find a human solution. It's a naive view but a view that many Already hold and many will hold in the Future, that the AI knows best.