3 ms·
Except there's concrete evidence that the execution of safety is subpar due to market pressures to release and monetize (Google panic release). There's also ev
by moonchrome 4y ago
Except there's concrete evidence that the execution of safety is subpar due to market pressures to release and monetize (Google panic release).
There's also evidence that progress is exceeding people's expectations and we might not even realize what we have is dangerous untill too late.
If we had a probable collision trajectory of a meteor or signs of Yellowstone activating then yeah those would be good ideas.
- 23B1 4y agoThe chain of 'logic' that leads to the outcome you propose is bonkers, though. Here's Elizer's logic from his recent polemic in Time https://time.com/6266923/ai-eliezer-yudkowsky-open-letter-not-enough/ https://time.com/6266923/ai-eliezer-yudkowsky-open-letter-no... "A sufficiently intelligent AI won’t stay confined to computers for long. In today’s world you can email DNA strings to laboratories that will produce proteins on demand, allowing an AI initially confined to the internet to build artificial life forms or bootstrap straight to postbiological molecular manufacturing." This is Ridley Scott, not Aristotle.