He was wealthy before and has other means to parlay openai to further wealth. You’re doing the “only the true messiah would deny his divinity” argument — if he

He was wealthy before and has other means to parlay openai to further wealth. You’re doing the “only the true messiah would deny his divinity” argument — if he was going to profit, that’s bad. If he’s not going to profit, obviously he’s lying and is going to profit, so that’s bad. IMO arguments are only meaningful if they can be falsified. Your argument can’t be falsified because you’re using a lack of evidence as proof.