3 ms·
Why is that not great? It makes absolutely zero sense for him to have no equity, or at least some agreement in place that equity is coming. Or some other terms
by ryanSrich 4y ago
Why is that not great? It makes absolutely zero sense for him to have no equity, or at least some agreement in place that equity is coming. Or some other terms that essentially amount to equity. You don’t need evidence to be skeptical of the situation.
- brookst 4y agoHe was wealthy before and has other means to parlay openai to further wealth. You’re doing the “only the true messiah would deny his divinity” argument — if he was going to profit, that’s bad. If he’s not going to profit, obviously he’s lying and is going to profit, so that’s bad. IMO arguments are only meaningful if they can be falsified. Your argument can’t be falsified because you’re using a lack of evidence as proof.
- bagacrap 4y agoWhen did he say profit was bad?
- peripitea 4y agoWhy does it make zero sense? It makes perfect sense to me.