1. I openly question gpt's ability to generate compelling narratives. Perhaps modules could be feed into it to provide enough background for it go off of, but

1. I openly question gpt's ability to generate compelling narratives. Perhaps modules could be feed into it to provide enough background for it go off of, but I would consider this a weakness to GPT compared to humans. 2. Current GPT based DMs allow the player to do basically anything they want. Human DMs offer more control over the game, and will follow closer to tradition and unwritten roles than GPT allows. There's also a fun part of the game for the player in which they convince the DM to allow an action they wouldn't otherwise. 3. D&D's low tech nature is a draw for a lot of players. Some books, some paper, pencils, dice, a table. Simple stuff. I think many players would push back on screens and other high tech.