3 ms·
Both can be true at the same time. I see it likely that: 1. Superintelligent AGI seems inevitable, even if it takes thousands of years. So fighting against it
by akvadrako 4y ago
Both can be true at the same time. I see it likely that:
1. Superintelligent AGI seems inevitable, even if it takes thousands of years. So fighting against it requires destroying all progress and freedom.
2. But if it comes we are no longer the dominant species; we'll have as much control as big animals do now. If that isn't essentially being destroyed, it's close enough.
- rockzom 4y ago(((:::)))
- ETH_start 4y agoAGI doesn't mean animal-like intelligence. AI is necessarily being designed as an extension of us, and not an independent will that has its own motivations, because that is the only way it is useful. Evolution took billions of years to produce us, with our self-interest pursuing intelligence. An errant experiment is not going to create a humanity-leapfrogging animal-like intelligence, and humanity will not give animal-like artificial intelligences millions of generations to evolve.