4 ms·
I don't think that is a generous interpretation. Substitute AI experiments with playing russian roulette or something similarly dangerous and the logic seems so
by marginalia_nu 4y ago
I don't think that is a generous interpretation. Substitute AI experiments with playing russian roulette or something similarly dangerous and the logic seems sound. Blowing your head off is possible, but not probable (1 in 6 chance).
The magnitude of the perceived risk matters.
- 23B1 4y agoA 1 in 6 chance is a discrete number. The chance of annihilation due to AGI is not. You're defending an appeal to probability fallacy with a false equivalence fallacy. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_equivalence https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_equivalence
- marginalia_nu 4y agohttps://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_fallacy https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_fallacy