> not that it makes it any less impressive! Covering three sides is exactly the same amount of impressive as covering six sides? I can imagine the impressiven

> not that it makes it any less impressive! Covering three sides is exactly the same amount of impressive as covering six sides? I can imagine the impressiveness isn’t linear with sides, so it doesn’t have to half as impressive, but I would expect some dependence. Maybe it saturates? So covering three sides is peak impressiveness, and any more sides has no effect? Although your language leaves open the possibility that covering three sides is more impressive than covering six sides. Not sure why that would be, but maybe three sides is the optimum?