3 ms·
The spirit is the same, but I don't think we're talking about the same thing. It's "chattel", and according to wikipedia, for whatever that's worth, it's "tresp
by jrootabega 4y ago
The spirit is the same, but I don't think we're talking about the same thing. It's "chattel", and according to wikipedia, for whatever that's worth, it's "trespass to chattels".
I didn't see any reference there about treating people in a customer relationship as the "chattel" referred to in this law.
- hedora 4y agoIt wasn’t originally meant to be applied to employees. That’s a modern interpretation. It seems inevitable that some court will extend the interpretation to customers too.