> Does this throw out the whole moral panic about animal welfare? Whether or not plants suffer has no bearing on whether we should cause animals to suffer. Ani

> Does this throw out the whole moral panic about animal welfare? Whether or not plants suffer has no bearing on whether we should cause animals to suffer. Animal agriculture requires the use of more plants as animal feed than eating plants directly, so even if plants feel pain, we'd cause less harm by eating them than eating animals. > If plants suffer too, isn't it wrong to eat them as well? This says nothing about plant sentience and whether or not they suffer. You shouldn't conclude that plants suffer simply because cutting their leaves results in a sound. We know animals are sentient, we don't have currently beleive that plants are.