9 ms·

ok..so instead of x- ..what should we be using for none standard header?

• ericwaller 15y ago
  From page 3 (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-appsawg-xdash-02#page-3 http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-appsawg-xdash-02#page-...): employ meaningful but currently unused names
  • gojomo 15y ago
    My interpretation: Google for your intended usage; if it seems novel, good. Make sure you document so the next person who Googles for it sees you're already semantic-squatting on that name in context. Not pretty for those who like certainty and formality, but very in tune with how things can work with global search.
    • nemetroid 15y ago
      That is; the same way as before just without the X.
• Karellen 15y ago
  "Note: If the relevant parameter name space has conventions about associating parameter names with those who create them, a parameter name could incorporate the organization's name or primary domain name" "4. SHOULD identify a convention to allow local or implementation-specific extensions, and reserve delimeters for such uses as needed." As has been mentioned by another commenter[0] these parts invite the drawing of parallels to CSS vendor prefixes. e.g. -moz-/-ms-/etc... [0] http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3540150 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3540150