3 ms·
I'm asking again. What good is it performance when you don't need those people because you have no meaningful work to give them due to shifts in market/product
by ChuckNorris89 4y ago
I'm asking again. What good is it performance when you don't need those people because you have no meaningful work to give them due to shifts in market/product development?
Keeping expensive seat warmers?
- candiodari 4y agoYou are just pushing the same pre-existing assumption here. Obviously that company thinks they're useful. Also I would argue that if a company cannot use these people to make profit and grow, that company should probably be ended. If you simplify things, then literally the ONLY point of a (public) company is to invest in the means of production, and have that investment grow over time. If a company cannot use people to grow, it's useless as a company. At best this is a serious management failure.