3 ms·
Good point. I wonder how low a resolution in facial keypoints you would have to go to have any plausible claim that the data is no longer PII? “We don’t have
by bigiain 4y ago
Good point.
I wonder how low a resolution in facial keypoints you would have to go to have any plausible claim that the data is no longer PII?
“We don’t have any PII as covered by the GDPR. We do however have this list of 15 xy coordinates here, that coincidentally happen to match up with the output of a facial keypoints that might be generated if somebody _else_ had a photo of you and ran it through a keypoints extraction algorithm…”
I’d probably take a day off to do some justice tourism and visit the courtroom the day a lawyer for Clearview tried to argue “My clients product, which they sell as a method of personally identifying individuals, does not store any personally identifying data for individuals it identifies, your honor.”
- realusername 4y ago> I wonder how low a resolution in facial keypoints you would have to go to have any plausible claim that the data is no longer PII? It doesn't matter how low the matching resolution is, they still need to store the whole image somewhere to show the match and that is 100% personal information