> that it is explicit pornographic material and that you claim that it represents a person of age minor, even if it really isn’t, it becomes child pornography

> that it is explicit pornographic material and that you claim that it represents a person of age minor, even if it really isn’t, it becomes child pornography This is idiotic https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/2d/Ron_Jeremy_2009.jpg https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/2d/Ron_Jere... This photo of a 55-year old ron jeremy is actually of a 15 year old, as per my claim right here. Come and get me, RCMP!