2 ms·
"I haven't read the decision" Please stop there. If you haven't even read the decision how can your opinion possibly be well informed?
by bigDinosaur 4y ago
"I haven't read the decision"
Please stop there. If you haven't even read the decision how can your opinion possibly be well informed?
- mindslight 4y agoI had read the Wikipedia summary, which gave me a decent idea of the general shape of the case. Having now read the opinion, I don't think my initial estimate of the case from Wikipedia was far off. Modulo the specific details of Colorado law (and similar must-arrest laws across many states), for which down thread I do say the dissent makes a convincing case on those merits. But that doesn't have much bearing on my original main point, but rather just how I might have made that point. BTW what prompted you to chime in this way instead of continuing to read the thread and seeing I did go on to read the primary source?