> factual output was never GPT-4's nor any other LLM's design goal. Tell that to 50% of HN who think it's going to replace Google. I think they should be a red

> factual output was never GPT-4's nor any other LLM's design goal. Tell that to 50% of HN who think it's going to replace Google. I think they should be a red disclaimer that answers are often incorrect and shouldn't be trusted in any way. That being said, I think it's a useful tool for all queries that don't expect a factually correct answer, or can be easily checked. For instance, summary, rewriting, simple code synthesis, and possibly many other niche applications.