2 ms·
Yeah, and that's not an argument against this kind of system, since it's obviously cheaper and more scalable than any human. (And I don't think you're arguing a
by chatmasta 4y ago
Yeah, and that's not an argument against this kind of system, since it's obviously cheaper and more scalable than any human. (And I don't think you're arguing against it as a valid use case anyway.) But it will be interesting to see how this kind of "programming" paradigm seeps into the various software ecosystems.
- stavros 4y agoI think we'll have two workflows, one that is pure programming, and one that is AI/fuzzy, basically AI "modules". Same way you interface with people today, really.