The irony with people talking about "neutrality" is the tendency of the people making such demands to be even more obsessed with distorting the input data to pr

The irony with people talking about "neutrality" is the tendency of the people making such demands to be even more obsessed with distorting the input data to produce outcomes censored to take into account their viewpoint than the 'AI safety' and PR people. I mean, how much censorship (or artificial curation) would you need to avoid an ML model giving "the climate warrior version" of questions about whether the world was getting warmer?!