I started reading completely ready to dismiss the author. But I read the article and the guy provides researched and reasoned opinions, understands LLM, and isn

I started reading completely ready to dismiss the author. But I read the article and the guy provides researched and reasoned opinions, understands LLM, and isn't just spewing an uninformed opinion. I am going to address his point from another perspective: 1. A revolutionary bullshit parrot is still revolutionary and exceptionally useful. 2. There is a high probability the bullshit parrot will get less bullshitty as time goes on and new versions of GPT are released. 3. Most humans are bullshit parrots, and not very good ones at that. Even GPT in its current state can augment the not very good (and very good) bullshit parrots in the labor force, academia, and creative fields.