3 ms·
Are you saying that DC was worse than SF? I find that hard to believe. SF has worse coverage, fewer trains and felt much more dangerous. I was able to live in
by dougmwne 4y ago
Are you saying that DC was worse than SF? I find that hard to believe. SF has worse coverage, fewer trains and felt much more dangerous.
I was able to live in DC for 4 years without a car but with a bike and my walking shoes and found it a mostly happy experience. The trains could have been more frequent and some areas of the city had sparse coverage, but it was not so bad. Europe and NYC is a leap better of course.
Sounds like I missed a crime wave though. That’s a shame, I remember the metro system being safe and clean during the 2010’s.
- atlasunshrugged 4y agoNo, I was saying that it was subpar in DC compared to Europe. SF doesn't even register, it's just pathetic.