3 ms·
Is that true? I was under the impression it was just like with the previous GPT models, where ChatGPT was an instruction tuned and pre-prompted setup designed f
by saurik 4y ago
Is that true? I was under the impression it was just like with the previous GPT models, where ChatGPT was an instruction tuned and pre-prompted setup designed for interactive conversations over the underlying GPT model you had access to via the API that was in its close-to-as-trained state of being a generative autocomplete.
- sho_hn 4y agoI think it's true. See e.g. https://openai.com/research/gpt-4 https://openai.com/research/gpt-4 making no distinctions. Altman has stated in interviews they are considering releasing the un-tuned "base model", but they haven't done this. For GPT-3, you can get models on the API via the "completion" end points (includes base models) and via the "chat" endpoints. For GPT-4, they've only released the latter. So my point is: You can absolutely use ChatGPT to build an opinion on what GPT-4 is capable of. Arguably even better than on the Playground, as the ChatGPT frontend supports a bigger token window than the Playground frontend (8k vs. 2k). Of course the actual API supports the full token window (and if you're off the separate waitlist for this, even the full 32k). But it's still the same model.