3 ms·
It'll be their first attempt with any hope of success. I'm thinking Kinect on a tablet, among other things. I don't think people were ready for tablets during M
by kennjason 15y ago
It'll be their first attempt with any hope of success. I'm thinking Kinect on a tablet, among other things. I don't think people were ready for tablets during Microsoft's initial offerings. Touch interfaces just hadn't come far enough.
- r00fus 15y agoDid you see thedaily's take [1] on kinect for laptops? The reason you won't see kinect on a tablet anytime soon is this one observation: "It murders batteries Devices in the field must be plugged in whenever possible since the Kinect technology drains juice in a hurry..." Laptops generally have much larger battery capacity (for example my current laptop has 94Wh while an iPad2 has 25Wh), and if Kinect kills laptop battery, forget about mobile for now. [1] http://www.thedaily.com/page/2012/01/31/013112-tech-kinect-laptop/ http://www.thedaily.com/page/2012/01/31/013112-tech-kinect-l...
- kennjason 15y agoI'm sure there's hurdles to overcome before it's a reality. Even if it's limited capacity, I think we're ready for gesture-based computing and I think Microsoft's closer to making that a reality than anyone else.
- r00fus 15y agoI disagree with your assessment. "ready for gesture-based computing" indicates more than just public acceptance (which is likely there) - it requires the hardware power and capacity, form factor, and killer-app software use cases. This mindset of "build the OS, the apps will come" is no longer valid anymore, not when competitors like Google, Amazon and Apple are building out destinations and ecosystems, selling consumers on direct apps and tools rather than platforms that promise... especially, in Microsoft's case, when those promises have failed to pan out repeatedly in prior years.
- kennjason 15y agoIf you fail, keep trying. Microsoft was bound to have some spaghetti stick to the wall eventually. I think the hardware is here; I really do.