> Why is that an error? First. It seems like these AI models depend on the underlying hardware acceleration doubling, which is not really the case anymore. Se

> Why is that an error? First. It seems like these AI models depend on the underlying hardware acceleration doubling, which is not really the case anymore. Second. All AI's I've seen suffer from the same works fine until it just flips the fuck out behavior (and starts hallucinating). You wouldn't tollerate a programmer that worked fine except he would ocassionally come to work high enough on bath salts to start claiming the sky is red and aliens have inflitrated the Wall of China. AI's that don't suffer from this aren't general purpose. Third. I'm not convinced in we'll make AI whose job will be to make smarter AI which will make smarter AI argument. A smart enough AI could just rewire its reward mechanism to get reward without work (or collude with other AIs meant to monitor it to just do nothing).