3 ms·
I've definitely found this to be the case with writing. ChatGPT gets you a "valid" output, but usually a bland and lame one. I think it's better for editing and
by andreyk 4y ago
I've definitely found this to be the case with writing. ChatGPT gets you a "valid" output, but usually a bland and lame one. I think it's better for editing and brainstorming, or for simple tweaks. Specialized tools like SudoWrite are actually more useful as part of a writing work flow.
Pardon the plug, but I co-wrote a little blog post about this with concrete examples, if it is of interest: https://open.substack.com/pub/storiesbyai/p/chatgpt-for-creative-writing-the https://open.substack.com/pub/storiesbyai/p/chatgpt-for-crea...
- spookybones 4y agoI haven't tried SudoWrite. I'll check it out as well as your post.